Quantcast
Channel: Bharat Pensioners Samaj
Viewing all 4900 articles
Browse latest View live

Elderly: A human rights viewpoint

$
0
0



Striving for autonomy and independence of the elderly: A human rights viewpoint

The Asian Age. | Mala Kapur Shankardass
In turn, independence is the ability to perform actions of daily living and participate in society in accordance with one’s will.
In India, the NHRC submission at the 9th session in New York stated that older people due to failing health, economic insecurity, isolation, abuse, neglect, lack of preparedness for old age do not enjoy the right to autonomy and independence.
In India, the NHRC submission at the 9th session in New York stated that older people due to failing health, economic insecurity, isolation, abuse, neglect, lack of preparedness for old age do not enjoy the right to autonomy and independence. 
All over the world an important agenda emerging is strengthening the protection of rights of older persons and promoting their dignity. In this context the Open-ended Working Group (OEWG) on Ageing, established by the United Nations General Assembly with the purpose of strengthening the protection of the human rights of older persons, held its ninth session at United Nations Headquarters in the last week of July. The discussions focused on two important concerns this year, one, being autonomy and independence of older people, on which Member States, national human rights institutions, non-governmental organisations and United Nations system agencies and bodies gave substantive inputs. Few important concerns on which reflections were made was whether countries have the right to autonomy and independence of older persons defined in legal and policy frameworks, by which other rights are supported or affected by being denied, what are the challenges faced in being able to achieve autonomy and independence and what steps may be taken to ensure its realisation and if older people don’t enjoy the right to autonomy and independence then in what ways they can redre-ss it and further whether non-State actors had also responsibility and played a role in respecting and protecting the right to autonomy and independence of older persons.
The discussions and deliberations on these important issues were intense and rightfully demand attention to autonomy and independence as a basic human right of older persons even though it is not adequately defined in countries nor has explicit standards across regions to recognise it and make legal provisions for it. However, universally it is agreed that autonomy means the ability to make choices and decisions, including with support if necessary, as per one’s values and preferences.
In turn, independence is the ability to perform actions of daily living and participate in society in accordance with one’s will. But as we see all around us often older people are denied the right to make their own decisions without interference from others.
They have restrictions in being able to participate in family and cultural life, acting on their own ideas, doing things for themselves, solving their own problems and achieving their goals, in other words being independent.
In India, the NHRC submission at the 9th session in New York stated that older people due to failing health, economic insecurity, isolation, abuse, neglect, lack of preparedness for old age do not enjoy the right to autonomy and independence. Nonethe-less, the government is making efforts to provide older people their right and a significant legislative provision which exists in our country is the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. It is a mechanism through which older persons autonomy is promoted and protected. The seriousness of the government in reaching out to older persons is seen in the Act being amended to safeguard their rights and keep pace with changes in the society.
The government is recognising the rights which are essential for the enjoyment of the right to autonomy and independence by older persons in revising the National Policy for Senior Citizens by recognising their right to housing in old age, right to economic security, right to sanitation and hygiene, right to food in old age, right of disabled old persons, right against elder abuse and right to vote, besides having taken a stand by allowing passive euthanasia and right to die with dignity. These steps are in tune with developments all over the world especially since ageing of societies is inevitable and with increases in numbers and proportions of older people in the population the rights based approach can no longer be overlooked.
There is steady legislative progress for rights of older persons as well as for the establishment of national care systems and promotion of support mechanisms. State obligations along with participation of civil society members in many countries as in India too gradually are including facilitation of access to a range of in-home, residential, and other community-support services, including personal assistance necessary to support living and inclusion in the community and to prevent the isolation or segregation of older people from the community.
Within the rights-based perspective, an essential component is the rights of older persons to equal access to healthcare and to physical, psychological and sexual integrity, but also to receive comprehensive information and full and informed consent, appropriate health and hygiene standards, and active ageing as collated through different country responses at the OEWG meeting. There is also growing recognition to rights of autonomy and independence to include employment, accessibility to age related provisions and services, access to transportation, consumer protection, recreation, security and safety, the right to age in place, freedom from exploitation and persecution, among others. Clearly, in adopting a rights-based approach, inequalities affecting older women with regard to access to healthcare, employment, income security, and women living in rural or isolated areas needs due consideration along with special attention to persons over 80 who face a disproportionately higher risk of exclusion. Finally, there is need for international binding instruments to adapt a rights-based paradigm.
The writer is associate professor, department of sociology, Maitreyi College, University of Delhi, with specialisation in health, gerontology and development studies. Email: LittleThingsMatter @gmail.com.

Pension Adalats to be held all over the country by all Ministries/Departments on 18.9.2018

( DOCOM/R/2018/50279) Information sought under RTI, Act

Final settlrmrnt case of Late R N Goala

COMMUNICATION TO HONOURABLE PM

$
0
0

7 CPC REVISION OF PENSION IS AGAINST THE SPIRIT OF GOOD GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES , voiced by HON PM in his recent examples explained in an interview ..... I followed his concern for TRANSPSRENCY, riddance of NEPOTISM , CORRUPTION etc Thru GOOD GOVERNANCE PRACTICES.

Do  DEPTS WORKING UNDER HIM FOLLIW HIS MODEL OF GOOD GOVERNANCE?

Pl c my latest communication to Hon PM .... pl do share ...

VN
8 AUG 2018

———————————————

IMPORTANT / PL SHARE AS YOU LIKE

Dear friends,

After a Herculean effort and with assistance from my good friend SHRI V RAGHURAMAN, I SUCCEEDED  IN MY lucky 13th attempt, to LODGE A COMMUNICATION IN THE PORTAL OF “ WRITE TO ME” OF HON PM , UNDER THE TITLE OF “ SUGGESTION” :

Suggestion pertains to ENSURING GOOD GOVERNANCE IN DEPTS UNDER HIM VIZ DP&PAS AND DOP&T.

THIS RECORD CAN FORM A LEGAL ANNEXURE AS AND WHEN REQUIRED AND IS AVAILABLE IN PUNLUC PORTAL.

I WILL AWAIT THE REPLY WHICH MAY TAKE TWO TO THREE WEEKS.

REGARDS,

V NATARAJAN 36
08 AUG 2018
——————————————————————————————

Grievance Status
Print || Logout
Status as on 08 Aug 2018
Registration Number : PMOPG/E/2018/0380036
Name Of Complainant : V NATARAJAN
Date of Receipt : 08 Aug 2018
Received by : Prime Ministers Office
Officer name : Shri Ambuj Sharma
Officer Designation : Under Secretary (Public)
Contact Address : Public Wing
5th Floor, Rail Bhawan
New Delhi110011
Contact Number : 011-23386447
e-mail : ambuj.sharma38@nic.in
Grievance Description : SIR, Old CG pensioners acknowledge your efforts to improve GOVERNANCE ensuring TRANSPARENCY and rid of NEPOTISM and CORRUPTION. Request steps be taken up soon to ensure GOVERNANCE in Depts. functioning under PM , dealing with Service matters, viz DPPW and DOPT,achieve exemplary GOVERNANCE standards to avoid legal conflicts.Their practice has ignored good GOVERNANCE model of PM. This would have helped to reduce repetitive litigations which they resort upto APEX COURT . Pensioners comprising of veteran Scientists, Engineers- of Jt.Sec. level suffering reduced pensions repeatedly, have been appealing to DPPW DOPT for correct 7th CPC revised pensions,but the latter have not addressed the issues in the spirit of good GOVERNANCE. Issues concern DPPW conditional Orders issued of CABINET DECISIONS by detrimental methods on 7th CPC pension fixation to add on to similar earlier 6th CPC pension revision issues affecting all Pre 2006 SAG- S29 pensioners who have been pointing out deviations from good GOVERNANCE practices. 7 CPC revised pension orders issued by DPPW in 2016,has diluted the original CABINET ACCEPTED Option 1-allowing increments earned also for pension in the retiring pay scale-which would have ensured near PENSION PARITY between past and present pensioners. Instead,the same was subjected to a FEASIBILITY COMMITTEE-under very same PENSION Dept. hold- and based on its biased recommendations,under the garb of a reason of NON AVAILABILITY OF RECORDS(to determine last pay drawn,no. of increments etc) OF ONLY 14 % old pensioners,an alternate method of REVISING PENSION BASED ON 5th CPC NOTIONAL PAY FIXATION was imposed-Option 3 instead of Option1-.Sampling method adopted to conclude on the NONAVAILABILITY of records was most irrational and unscientific.Ironically the concocted NEW NOTIONAL PAY FIXATION METHOD under Option 3 adopted now for 7th CPC revised pension, needs same records as Option 1 and this proves unquestionably the hostile discrimination imposed on Pre 2006 and older pensioners.At the same time,the Post 2006/Pre 31.12 2015 retirees are being allowed REVISED PENSION BASED ON THEIR LAST PAY DRAWN. Rather a favour- NEPOTISTIC-for being in service before 11.2016. FEASIBILITY COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS have been IMPOSED, inspite of dissent by NCJCM and several Pensioner Bodies, Individuals. DPPW had ignored them and instead issued Orders - Tables in May,July and Sept 2017,causing reduced pensions to several old Pensioners specifically to Pre 2006 SAG S29 grade . For eg the 6th CPC SAG S29 MINIMUM PAY(judicially reviewed is REDUCED TO Rs.53000 INSTEAD OF Rs. 54700.Consequently,7th CPC REVISED MINIMUM PENSION is reduced to Rs.72210 instead of Rs.74250.Similarly, REPEATED BUNCHING OF INCREMENTS EARNED DURING 4th-5th CPC periods,have resulted in most Pensioners retiring at bottom to top Stages end up getting same BOTTOM STAGE pensions ONLY. CONCORDANCE TABLES in the ORDERS are TOTALLY INCORRECT AND UNJUSTIFIABLE.In effect the sanctity of cabinet accepted 7th CPC RECO based ON PAY PARITY appears to have been CORRUPTED . Old pensioners suffer a recurring loss of pension up to Rs.14000 per month.NOTIONAL PAY CAN NEVER LEGALLY SUBSTITUTE THE LAST PAST DRAWN.We appeal to your kind self to intervene to advise the Depts. concerned to ensure adoption of GOOD GOVERNANCE principles:1.To avoid compulsive litigations of pension parity between past and present pensioners. 2.To ensure the sanctity of legally established 6th CPC MINIMUM PENSION is not downgraded as adopted for 7th CPC starting PENSION -for Pre 2006 SAG figures are Rs.27350 and Rs.74250- 3.To avoid dividing the HOMOGENOUS CLASS of Pre and Post 1 1 2006 PENSIONERS within the lot of Pre 2016 PENSIONERS. 4.To ensure issue of BUNCHING RELIEF as committed in PG reply Dt 27 Sept 2017 is settled so that equals can draw equal pension without discrimination wrt date of retirement or date of revision, based on their LAST PAY DRAWN.
Current Status : RECEIVED THE GRIEVANCE
———————————

7TH CPC PENSION REVISION REPRESENTATION- BENEFIT OF UPGRADATION OF POSTS SUBSEQUENT TO THEIR RETIREMENT WOULD NOT BE ADMISSIBLE- PCDA CIRCULAR NO. C-189

$
0
0
Circular-c189_Representation regarding Revision of Pension of Pre-96 and Pre-2006 Pensioners, 11th July, 2018 

O/o The Principal Controller of Defence Accounts (Pension), 
Draupadighat, Allahabad – 211014 

Circular No.C-189
No.G1/C/0199/Vol-II/Tech 
O/o the PCDA (P) Allahabad 
Dated: 11.07.2018. 

To,

---------------------------------------- 
---------------------------------------- 
(All Head of Department under Min. of Defence) 

Sub:- Representations regarding revision of pension of Pre-96 & Pre-2006 Pensioners. 

Ref:- HQs letter No.5162/AT-P/Vol-LX dated 15.06.2018.  
Of late, a large number of representations have been received in our HQrs office regarding incorrect revision of 7th CPC PPOs in cases where posts have been upgraded. In this context, it is intimated that Min. of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions, Deptt of P&PW has already clarified vide OM F.No. 38/37/08-P&W (A) dated 11.02.2009 that the benefit of upgradation of posts subsequent to their retirement would not be admissible. 

In view of the above, the same would also be applicable on 7th CPC revision of Pre-2016 pensioners/family pensioners. 

Sd/- 
(Sandeep Thakur) 
Addl.CDA (P) 

-0-0-0-0- 

F.No.38/37/08-P&PW(A) 
Government of India 
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions 
Department of Pension & Pensioners’ Welfare 
Lok Nayak Bhawan; New Delhi-110003 

3rd Floor, Lok Nayak Bhawan 
Khan Market, New Delhi-110003 

Dated the 11th February, 2009 

OFFICE MEMORANDUM 

Subject:- Representations regarding revision of pension of pre-2006 pensioners. 

The undersigned is directed to say that in accordance with instructions contained in para 4.2 of this Department's OM of even number dated 1.92008, the fixation of pension will be subject to the provision that the revised pension, in no case, shall be lower than fifty percent of' the minimum of the pay in the pay band plus the grade pay corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale from which the pensioner had retired. In the case of HAG+ and above scales, this will be fifty percent of the minimum of the revised pay scale. It was clarified in the OM dated 3.10.2008 that the pension calculated at 50% of the minimum of pay in the pay band plus grade pay would be calculated at the minimum of the pay in the pay band (irrespective of the pre-revised scale of pay) plus the grade pay corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale. The pension will be reduced pro-rata, where the pensioner had less than the maximum required service for full pension as per rule 49 of the CCS(Pension) Rules, 1972 as applicable before 29.2008 and in no case it will be less than Rs. 3500/- pm. The fixation of family pension will be subject to the provision that the revised family pension, in no case, shall be lower than thirty percent of the sum of the minimum of the pay in the pay band and the grade pay thereon corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale from which the pensioner had retired. A Table indicating the revised pension based on revised pay bands and grade pay was also annexed. with this Department’s OM dated 14.10.2008.

2. A large number of representations/references are being received in this Department raising the following issues: 

(i) It has been alleged that the above instructions are discriminatory/anomalous and are not in conformity with the decision taken on the recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission; 

(ii) It has been suggested that certain pre-2006 scales of pay should be allowed pay band/grade pay or pay scales higher than that mentioned in Col. 6 in Annexure 1 to O.M. dated 14.10.2008; 

(iii) It has been suggested that in cases where certain posts have been upgraded and allowed higher pay band/grade pay or pay scale, the application of the provision in para 42 of the OM dated 1.9.2008 (as clarified from time to time) should be with reference to the upgraded pay band/grade pay or pay scale. 

3. These representations/references have been examined in consultation with Ministry of Finance- The instructions/clarifications issued in this regard are in consonance with the decision of the Government on the recommendations of the Sixth Central Pay Commission and no change is required to be made in this respect. 

4. The Table in Annexure-I of this Department’s OM dated 14.10.2008 is based on the CCS(Revised Rules), 2008 which are applicable to the employees in the service as on 11.2006 and no dispensation in this regard can be made in respect of pre-2006 pensioners for the purpose of application of the provision of Para 4.2 of this Department’s OM dated 1.92008. 

5. In accordance with the instructions contained in para 4.2 of this Department’s OM of even number dated 1.9.2008, the fixation of pension will be subject to the provision that the revised pension, in no case, shall be lower than fifty percent of the minimum of the pay in the pay band plus the grade pay corresponding to the pre- revised pay scale from which the pensioner had retired. Therefore, the benefit of upgradation of posts subsequent to their retirement would not be admissible to the pre-2006 pensioners in this regard. 

6. All references/representations received in this Department on the above issues stand disposed off accordingly. 

Sd/- 
(M.P. Singh) 
Director (PP) 
Telefax No.24624802 

Source:- [http://pcdapension.nic.in/pcdapension/7cpc/Circular-c189.pdf]

Recent Rly Pass Circulars

PCDA CIRCULAR NO 189


AIRF PNM hum No.19/2016 - Exclusion of retiring Rly employees from mandatory joining of RELHS-97.

Grant of Dearness Relief to Central Government pensioners / family pensioners Revised rate effective from 01.01.2016.

$
0
0
KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN (HQ)
18, Institutional Area,
Saheed Jeet Singh Marg
New Delhi-110016.
F.110230(Misc.)2018/KVS(HQ)/P&I/2059
Dated: 04/05.07.2018
The Manager(Instt.)
State Bank of India,
Main Branch(4th Floor),
Parliament Street,
New Delhi-110001
Subject :- Grant of Dearness Relief to Central Government pensioners / family pensioners Revised rate effective from 01.01.2016.
Sir,
As you are aware, KVS has implemented the recommendations of 7th CPC in terms of GOI, D/o P&PW OM No. 38/37/2016-P&PW(A) dated 04.08.2016, 12,05.2017 & 06.07.2017. In this regard, KVS(HQ) has issued instructions to all the Regional offices/ZIETs for implementation of 7th CPC in all cases of employees retiring with effect from June,2018. Further, they have also been instructed to revise the pension in case of employees retired between 01.01.2016 to 31.05.2018. Therefore, you are instructed to make the payment of dearness relief as per the recommendations of 7th CPC in all the cases of pensioners retiring from 01.01.2016 and thereafter where the pension has been revised in terms of 7th CPC.
The necessary orders in this regard are as follows:
1. OM No. 42/15/2016- P&PW(G) dated 16 Nov, 2016.
(From 01.01.2016 Dearness Relief Nil, From 01.07.2016 – Dearness Relief- 2%)
2. OM No. 42/15/2016-P&PW(G) dated 7 Apr, 2017.
(From 01.01.2017 Dearness Relief 4%)
3. OM No. 42/15/2016-P&PW(G) dated 28 Sep, 2017.
(From 01.07.2017 Dearness Relief 5%)
4. OM No. 42/15/2016-P&PW(G) dated 22 Mar, 2018.
(From 01.01.2018 Dearness Relief 7%)
It is pertinent to inform you that KVS(HQ} has instructed to all the Regional offices/ZIETs to clearly depict in the PPO that the pension has been revised/calculated in terms of 7th CPC.
You are, therefore, requested to comply with the aforementioned orders for payment of dearness relief in all cases of Pensioners/family pensioners of Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan from 01.01.2016 and thereafter where the pension has been revised in terms of 7th CPC.
This issues with the approval of the competent authority.
Yours faithfully
(A.K. Srivastava)
Assistant Commissioner(Finance)

CTSE (Cash less treatment Scheme for Emergency) Simplification-Rly Bd RTI reply

CRB writes to Secretary Finance for early approval for revision of pay level of group B officers to level 9 of 7th CPC Pay matrix & upgrading of 75% posts of Senior Supervisors in Group C Level 7 / GP 4600 to Group B Level 8 / GP 4800 in the interest of safety on Railways, and to remove stagnation amongst them.

How can a murder or rape accused become a legislator, asks judge- Courtesy The Hindu

$
0
0

Something has to be done to keep criminals at bay and prevent them from contesting elections,” Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra said on Thursday, voicing the Supreme Court’s anguish at the helplessness of society to prevent criminalisation of politics at the very entry-point.

The Chief Justice is presiding over a five-judge Constitution Bench hearing petitions to bar politicians facing charges of heinous crimes, like murder, rape and kidnapping, from contesting elections and transforming themselves into parliamentarians and legislators in State Assemblies.
But at the same time, the Supreme Court said it could not legislate for Parliament. “The court declares the law, the Parliament makes the law,” Justice Rohinton Nariman observed.
The court is mulling over what it said was its “genuine concern about criminal politics”. Under the Representation of People Act, only convicted lawmakers are disqualified, not those accused.
“Can we make such a law disqualifying persons against whom charges of heinous crimes have been framed by courts of law or should we tell the Parliament that by not laying down such a law, you are really giving criminals encouragement and hope? This is the question bothering us,” Chief Justice Misra told the petitioners, including advocate Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay, represented by senior advocates Dinesh Dwivedi, Siddharth Luthra and Gopal Sankaranarayanan.

Fast track courts

Attorney-General K.K. Venugopal submitted that fast track courts to try accused politicians were “the only solution”. Mr. Venugopal said charges in such cases are kept pending for long as witnesses don’t testify as the Whistleblowers Protection Act, which protects informers, is too weak to protect them or their families from repercussions.
Justice D.Y. Chandrachud asked how a murder and rape accused can become a legislator. Mr. Venugopal replied that a person is presumed innocent until he is proven guilty.
The Constitution Bench even considered asking the Election Commission to frame guidelines to prevent an accused from becoming a member of a political party. But Mr. Dwivedi countered that such a person can even contest as an independent. Mr. Dwivedi said the court should intervene as lawmakers may not bring a fresh law, considering that 35% to 45% of them have criminal records or face charges.
“We share your concern. We will think of a constitutional remedy… the Parliament has an obligation under Article 102 (1) (e) to make a law. As conscience-keepers of the Constitution, we (Supreme Court) can ask you (Parliament) to do it,” Chief Justice Misra observed.

Article 1

Health of elderly people

$
0
0

Health of Elderly People

10 AUG 2018

The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare had undertaken a Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) under the tertiary level activities of National Programme for Health Care of the Elderly (NPHCE) to assess the health status of the elderly and to provide comprehensive longitudinal evidence base on health, economic, social and overall well-being of people aged 45 years and above in India. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, Deemed University, has been appointed as a National Nodal Agency for conducting the LASI survey in the country.  The Harvard School of Public Health (HSPH) and the University of Southern California (USC) are the collaborating institutions for providing technical support for the LASI.

The main goal of LASI project is to collect credible scientific data on burden of disease, mental health, functional health, health care and social and economic well being of elderly population. The data is being collected based on internationally comparable research design, tools and adopting cutting edge scientific methods to provide the foundation for credible and acceptable data – for National and State level policy making and long- term scientific research. LASI project will provide data on demographics, household economic status, health and bio-markers, health insurance and health care utilization, family and social network, social welfare programmes, work and employment, retirement and pension, life satisfaction and expectations.

LASI wave-1 data collection has been completed in 16 States selected in phase-1 of the study. Factsheets of key indicators on health, social and economic wellbeing of elderly have been prepared for these 16 States.

Data collection is in progress for the remaining 20 States/UTs  in phase-2, wave-1. The factsheets of key indicators for these 20 phase-2 states/UTs is expected to be released in February 2019. The factsheets, national and state reports will include detailed data and analysis of health issues, economic and social wellbeing of elderly population in India and states.

These reports will be used for developing comprehensive national and state level health policies and programmes for elderly population in India.

The Union Minister of Health and Family Welfare, Shri J P Nadda stated this in a written reply in the Lok Sabha here today.

***


Bharat Pensioner e- magazine August 018 issue

$
0
0

I think you might like this book – "Bharat Pensioner e-magazine August 018 issue: Bharat Pensioner August 18 (Vol Viii)" by S C Maheshwari, D Jayaraman, Priti Saini.

Start reading it for free: http://amzn.in/hlsSVT8
It is available fr free download from 12th Aug to 15th August

Patient friendly facilities

$
0
0

patient friendly facilities

1. The Hospital should display important information at main entrance of the Hospital including:
a. List of Services
b.  Service timings
c.  List of Doctors &their availability
d. Special Clinic timings
e.  Important contact numbers for customer services, complaints, service requests for Ambulance etc.
2. The Reception and ‘May I Help You’ Counters are prominently located and easily identifiable. They are staffed by suitably trained personnel
3.  Details of consultation charges, fees and tariff list for the various services should made available at these Reception and ‘May I Help’ you counters
4.  Modern equipment and facilities should be available at the Hospital to ensures continuous availability of cold, hot and potable water, electricity, medical gases and vacuum.
5.  The Hospital Design should  incorporated suitable building materials, colours and lighting to provide a good ambience in OP and IP areas that promotes comfort, ease of stay, wellbeing and an early recovery of the Patients.

Fixation of maximum number of days for disposal of various Types of cases-M)D

ECHS- Change in system of referal

CGHS and CS(MA) Rules: Revised ceiling rates for reimbursement of the cost of Cardiac pacemaker, AICD, Combo-device, Rotablator and Aortic Stent Graft

$
0
0



Government of India 
Ministry of Health and Family Welfare 
Department of Health & Family Welfare 
Directorate General of CGHS 
Office of the Director, CGHS 

No: S-11011/29/2018-CGHS(HEC)/ DIR/CGHS 
Nirman Bhawan, New Delhi 
Dated the 6th August, 2018 

OFFICE MEMORANDUM 

Subject:- Revision of ceiling rates for reimbursement of the cost of Cardiac pacemaker, AlCD, Combo-device, Rotablator and Aortic Stent Graft for beneficiaries of CGHS/CS(MA) Rules.
  

With reference to the above subject attention is drawn to the OM No 12034/02/2014/Misc./- CGHS D.lll dated 22nd July 2014 vide which ceiling rates for reimbursement of the cost of Cardiac pacemaker, AICD, Combo-device, Rotablator and Aortic Stent Graft for beneficiaries of CGHS/CS (MA) Rules were prescribed and to state that the matter has been reviewed by the Ministry and it is decided to revise the ceiling rates as per the details given under:

Sl.No.Cardiac DeviceCeiling Rate
1
Single Chamber Cardiac Pacemaker without Rate ResponseRs.34,840/- + GST
2
Single Chamber Cardiac Pacemaker with Rate ResponseRs. 44,9281-+ GST
3
Dual Chamber Cardiac PacemakerRs.83,200/-+ GST
4
Bi-Ventricular Cardiac PacemakerRs.1,95,000/-+ GST
5
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (Single Chamber) (ICD/AICD-Single Chamber)Rs.1,75 786/-4+ GST
6
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (Dual Chamber) (ICD/AICD-Single Chamber)Rs. 3,75,000/-+ GST
7
Combo Device (CRT-D)Rs, 4.90,000/-+ GST
8
Aortic Stent Graft (expandable, bifurcated and including delivery system)Rs. 4,40.960/- + GST
9
Rotablator with AdvancerRs.49,920/-+ GST
10
Rotablator BurrRs.23,920/-+ GST
2. Other terms and conditions prescribed under OM No 12034/02/2014/Misc./-CGHS D.III dated 22nd July 2014 shall remain unchanged. 

3. These rates shall remain valid till the rates for the above devices are notified by National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA). 

4. Issued with the concurrence of SS&FA, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare vide CD - No.1295 dated 25.07.2018. 

(Dr. Atul Prakash) 
Director, CGHS


Viewing all 4900 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>