Quantcast
Channel: Bharat Pensioners Samaj
Viewing all 4990 articles
Browse latest View live

Income Tax for FY 2020-21 AY 2021-22, Union budget,Go for exemption or not?

$
0
0


Income Tax for FY 2020-21 AY 2021-22, Union budget,Go for exemption or not?


In a marathon Budget speech on 1 Feb 2020, Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, proposed to introduce simplified tax regime, new tax slabs with reduced rates for an annual income of up to Rs 15 lakh for those not taking exemptions and deductions. The new system is, however, optional and will co-exist with the old one with three slabs and various exemptions and deductions.  How do you decide which one to pick? Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) has been abolished and dividends will be taxed in hands of the recipient taxpayers at applicable slab rates. This article looks at Budget 2020 and changes proposed.


Income Tax FY 2020-21 with or without exemption
Income Tax FY 2020-21 with or without exemption

  • Dividend Distribution Tax (DDT) has been abolished and dividends will be taxed in hands of the recipient taxpayers at applicable slab rates. TDS @ 10% will be applicable on dividend paid to an individual exceeding 5,000 during the year.
  • Deposit insurance cover raised to Rs 5 lakh.
  • Instead of the annual tax statement (Form 26AS) for taxpayers on the online tax portal, a more comprehensive annual financial statement which will capture multiple information such as sale/purchase of immovable property, share-based transactions, etc in addition to details of taxes deducted at source has been proposed. This will enable taxpayers to reconcile the details reported in their tax returns with the information already available with the tax authorities, thereby reducing litigation.
  • Vivaad se Vishwas’ Scheme to be introduced to settle pending income tax disputes where taxpayers can pay the amount of disputed tax (no interest or penalty) on or before March 31, 2020, and . Taxpayers can also pay tax under dispute by June 30, 2020 with some additional amount (expected to be lower than the penalty/interest exposure) under this scheme.
  • Travelling abroad or making a foreign remittance under the Reserve Bank’s Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS). Tour operators/banks (authorised dealers) will collect tax at source of 5% from you. If you don’t furnish your PAN/Aadhaar, the tax to be collected will increase to 10%
  • All income tax notices will be issued only in electronic mode. You may also receive intimation on your registered email ID. Do keep personal details like email id and mobile number updated on the income tax department’s portal for timely receipt of such notices.
  • Employer’s contribution to provident fund, National Pension System and superannuation fund exceeding in aggregate 7.5 lakh per year to be taxed as salary in hands of the employee. Interest, dividend and other similar incomes arising on such excess contribution (exceeding 7.5 lakh) to be taxed as well. This will lead to additional tax liability, especially for high net worth individuals.
  • Payment of tax on ESOPs received by employees of eligible startups to be deferred. Such tax is now payable on completion of five years from year of allotment of shares or sale of shares or cessation of employment, whichever is earlier. This will improve cash flow for employees. However, such benefits are only available for employees of eligible startups and not of all employers.
  • For Homebuyers:
    • No adjustments to the sale consideration on transfer of immovable property can be made where variation between stamp duty value and sale consideration is not more than 10% of latter (earlier 5%). This will reduce hardship to taxpayers for genuine transactions in real estate.
    • Additional tax deduction of up to 1.5 lakh for interest on housing loan has been extended to loans sanctioned up to March 31, 2021 (earlier, March 31, 2020).
  • Resident of India
    • Budget 2020 proposes that if an individual who is a citizen of India or person of Indian origin visits India for 120 days or more in a financial year and had spent more than 365 days in last four years, then such an individual will also become ‘resident’ in India.
  • NRI: ‘ordinarily resident
    • Budget 2020 has proposed to hike the number of years required of being a resident by an individual to qualify as ‘ordinarily resident’ from at least two years currently to at least four years out of the previous 10 years. This would make the ‘not ordinarily’ resident to ‘ordinarily resident’ easily if he was resident individual in four years out of the 10 previous years.
    • Currently, as per income tax laws, an individual qualifies as a resident individual if he/she stays for more than 182 days in the country.
  • Details of the eligible donation under Section 80G will be pre-filled in the income tax returns on the basis the information submitted by the donee (charitable institution). There is a possibility of claims being disallowed if the proper details of donations are not submitted.
  • The Budget also impacts you through higher customs duties on a whole range of imported products, from footwear to electronics, furniture, wall fans, kitchenware, as well as some alcoholic beverages. All of these could get costlier.

Income Tax Slabs in Budget 2020-21

Finance Minister, Nirmala Sitharaman, proposed to introduce simplified tax regime, new tax slabs with reduced rates for an annual income of up to Rs 15 lakh for those not taking exemptions and deductions. The new system is, however, optional and will co-exist with the old one with three slabs and various exemptions and deductions.  It is an effort to provide relief and simplicity to taxpayers, particularly those at lower and middle-income levels.
The tax structure has been rejigged with the introduction of four thinly-sliced tax slabs between Rs 5 lakh and Rs 15 lakhs. from 20% to 10% between Rs 5 lakh and Rs 7.5 lakh, from 20% to 15% in the Rs 7.5 lakh-Rs 10 lakh bracket, from 30% to 20% for Rs 10 lakh-Rs 12.5 lakh and from 30% to 25% between Rs 12.5 lakh and Rs 15 lakh.


Income Tax FY 2020-21 with or without exemption
Income Tax FY 2020-21 with or without exemption

The FM in her speech said this would lead to “substantial tax benefit” and gave the example of a person earning Rs 15 lakh and not using any exemptions now will pay only Rs 1.95 lakh of tax, as compared to Rs 2.73 lakh — a saving of Rs 78,000This optional scheme, the FM said, is estimated to cost the exchequer Rs 40,000 crore a year in foregone I-T revenues.
Those availing of deductions and exemptions might choose to go for status quo i.e old way and pay tax as per the old regime.  What the speech did not spell out, but the Budget documents did, is that the option to choose the new scheme would be reversible for those who do not have any business income. If you are a businessman and opt for the new regime, you can go back to the old system, but only once. However, for the salaried, there is no such restriction

List of Deductions removed

Let’s look at the list of exemptions and deductions that go out if you opt for the new regime:
  • Standard Deduction of Rs 50,000
  • Leave Travel Concession
  • House Rent Allowance(HRA)
  • Food vouchers of Rs 50/meal
  • Deduction under Section 80C i.e. equity linked savings scheme (ELSS), provident fund (PF), insurance premium, school fees, and principal repayment on housing loan
  • Interest on housing loan
  •  80CCC (contribution towards certain pension fund),
  • Section 80D (health insurance),
  • 80E (interest on loan for higher education),
  • 80EE (interest on loan taken for residential property),
  • 80EEB (purchase of electric vehicle):  Deduction on Auto Loan interest for purchase of electric vehicle Up to Rs 1.5 lakh
  • 80EEA: Additional deduction on Home Loan interest on affordable houses u/s 80EEA – Up to Rs 1.5 lakh
  • 80G (donation to charitable institutions),
  • 80GG (rent paid).
  • Tax rebate u/s 87A – Up to Rs 12,500 on taxable income up to Rs 5 lakh
  • Deduction on Home Loan interest – Up to Rs 2 lakh
Apart from the above, the following two deductions introduced last year are also to be scrapped under new tax regime:
Except tax benefit on HRA, by fully availing all deductions, a salaried employee under old regime may end up paying no tax on gross salary of up to Rs 13.25 lakh (after HRA benefit), assuming he has no other source of income.
However, deductions such as per diems (daily allowance on travel) and employer’s contribution to National Pension System are still available

With or Without Exemptions which Tax System to choose?

The answer to the question above depends on your level of income, whether you use tax-saving investments, and if so, to what extent.  For incomes up to Rs 15 lakh, you do get a lower tax rate, but this means you cannot avail of deductions and exemptions, ranging from HRA and standard deduction to those for investments under section 80C or medical insurance premium under Section 80D. That clearly involves a trade-off. Pensioners and new entrants to the job market, who have no investments in tax-saving schemes or HRA and LTA benefits may gain under the new tax regime. 


Income Tax FY 2020-21 with or without exemption comparison

Case I—Salaried individual not claiming any exemptions or deductions
Assuming no tax deductions or exemption are claimed in the existing personal tax regime, the individual with gross salary of Rs 7.5 lakh would save tax of Rs 15,600 if he/she opts for the new personal tax regime. At Rs 10 lakh, the individual would save Rs 28,600 in tax and at Rs 12.5 lakh he/she would save Rs 49,400. An individual earning Rs 15 lakh or above will save Rs 62,400 in tax.
Gross salary income levelTax payable in Existing RegimeTax payable in New RegimeAdditional tax saving/ (payable)
Claiming no exemptions
At 7.5 lakh54,60039,00015,600
At 10 lakh1,06,60078,00028,600
At 12.5 lakh1,79,4001,30,00049,400
At 15 lakh2,57,4001,95,00062,400
At 20 lakh4,13,4003,51,00062,400
Case II— Salaried individual claiming most common deduction/exemptions, i.e. under sections 80C, 80D and standard deduction
Assuming the individual is claiming these tax breaks: standard deduction of Rs 50,000, deduction of Rs 1.5 lakh under section 80C and Rs 25,000 under section 80D for medical premium. In this case, if the individual opts for the new personal tax regime then at gross salary of Rs 7.5 lakh the person will have to pay Rs 20,800 extra tax, at a gross salary of Rs 12.5 lakh the additional tax payable will be Rs 5,200. However, at a gross salary level of Rs 15 lakh or above the individual will save tax of Rs 7800.
Gross salary income levelTax payable in existing regimeTax payable in new regimeAdditional tax saving/ (payable)
Claiming: 1.25 lakh in exemptions
standard deduction of Rs 50,000, deduction of Rs 1.5 lakh under section 80C and Rs 25,000 under section 80D for medical premium.
At 7.5 lakh18,20039,000(20,800)
At 10 lakh70,20078,000(7,800)
At 12.5 lakh1,24,8001,30,000(5,200)
At 15 lakh2,02,8001,95,0007,800
At 20 lakh3,58,8003,51,0007,800

Case III— Salaried individual claiming more exemptions/deduction, i.e. under sections 80C, 80D, standard deduction and HRA exemption

Assuming the individual is claiming these tax breaks: standard deduction of Rs 50,000, deduction of Rs 1.5 lakh under section 80C and Rs 25,000 under section 80D for medical premium and HRA exemption (varied as per salary income level). In this case if the individual opts for the new personal tax regime then at gross salary of Rs 7.5 lakh (claiming HRA exemption of INR 150,000) the person will have to pay Rs 39,000 extra tax, at a gross salary of Rs 10 lakh (claiming HRA exemption of INR 200,000) the additional tax payable will be Rs 49,400, at a gross salary of Rs 12.5 lakh (claiming HRA exemption of INR 250,000) the additional tax payable will be Rs 59,800, at a gross salary of Rs 15 lakh (claiming HRA exemption of INR 300,000) the additional tax payable will be Rs 83,200 and at a gross salary level of Rs 20 lakh (claiming HRA exemption of INR 400,000) the additional tax payable will be Rs 117,000.
Gross salary income levelHRA claimedTax payable in Existing RegimeTax payable in New RegimeAdditional tax saving/ (payable)
Claiming: 1.25 lakh in exemption + HRA(varied as per salary income level)
Standard deduction of Rs 50,000, deduction of Rs 1.5 lakh under section 80C and Rs 25,000 under section 80D for medical premium and HRA exemption
At 7.5 lakhs150,00039,000(39,000)
At 10 lakhs200,00028,60078,000(49,400)
At 12.5 lakhs250,00070,2001,30,000(59,800)
At 15 lakhs300,0001,11,8001,95,000(83,200)
At 20 lakhs400,0002,34,0003,51,000(1,17,000)
For instance, income between Rs 5 lakh and Rs 7.5 lakh annually will be taxed at 10% in the new regime instead of the 20% you would pay under the current scheme (which continues as an option). If you have an annual income of Rs 7.5 lakh, this translates into a saving of Rs 25,000 in tax. Add the cess of 4% and you get a total saving of Rs 26,000. However, this is possible only if you are not claiming any deductions or exemptions. If you are claiming Rs 1.25 lakh or more as deductions or exemptions, say for standard deduction (flat Rs 50,000 is allowed) plus other deductions under Section 80C — say for PF, LIC premium or home loan interest — then it is best to continue under the current regime because the gain will be more than offset by the addition to taxable income.
For an annual income of up to Rs 6 lakh, the tax liability under the new regime will be higher than that in the old system. This is because a standard deduction of Rs 50,000 allowed earlier is missing under the new regime. Therefore, the tax liability will be the same in both systems only up to an annual income of Rs 6 lakh. For other slabs, even the statutory savings under Employees’ Provident Fund and life-insurance buys make the old system attractive due to the exemptions.
For example, if one has a total income of Rs 7.5 lakh per annum (Rs 62,500 per month) with a monthly basic of Rs 40,000, his EPF deduction at the rate of 12% will be Rs 57,600.
  •  if one buys an insurance policy with an annual premium of Rs 17,400 — taking his total savings and investments to Rs 75,000 per annum — his tax liability after standard deduction of Rs 50,000 in the old system will be the same as that under the new regime.
  • Further, if X claims tax benefits against school fees, mediclaim or a housing loan, he will be better off in the old system due to the deductions allowed.
If you have an annual income of Rs 10 lakh, this translates into a saving of Rs 39,000 – assuming that you haven’t claimed any deductions or exemptions. But, typically an individual would avail of a standard deduction and have some investments. So, if you are claiming Rs 1.87 lakh or more as deductions/exemptions, again, it is best not to switch.
Share 

BUDGET 2020 tax regime

information sought under RTI

Charge Allowance of Rly Officers to be treated as Pay for wkg out notional pay in 7th cpc - BPS wins.

$
0
0









PC-VII No.148/2020
RBE No.14 /2020
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA (BHARAT SARKAR)
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS (RAIL MANTRALAYA)
(RAILWAY BOARD)
No. D-43/15/2019-F(E)III
New Delhi, dated: 30.01.2020.
The General Managers/Principal Financial Advisors,
All Zonal Railways/Production Units.
Sub : Reckoning of Charge Allowance for the purpose of revision of Pension of Pre-2016 retirees in terms of 7th CPC recommendations – reg.
Consequent upon the recommendations of 7th CPC, instructions were issued vide Board’s letters No.2016/F(E)III/1(1)/7 dated 10.08.2016 and 22.05.2017, regarding revision of pension/family pension of pre-2016 pensioners/family pensioners. A number of references have been received in this office for reckoning of Charge Allowance for the purpose of notional fixation of pay and accordingly revision of pension w.e.f. 01.01.2016.
 The true nature of charge allowance was earlier considered by the Board and it was decided that the charge allowance, which is actually in the nature of pay restricted under FR-35. should be reckoned as ‘Pay’ as defined in Rule 1303(FR-9)(21)(a)(i) R-II/6th Edition and as such, it would count as pay for the purposes of pension. gratuity etc. as well as for leave encashment. Accordingly, instructions were issued vide letter No. F(E)III/94/PN1/26 dated 23.06.1995.
3. The issue has again been examined in Board keeping in view the earlier decision on charge allowance cited in para 2 above and it has been decided as follows:-
(i) Since. Board had already decided to treat the charge allowance as pay restricted under FR-35 and to reckon it as emoluments for pensionary benefits vide letter dated 23.06.1995, the charge allowance may be taken into account for notional fixation of pay for the purpose of revision of pension/family pension of pre-2016 retirees w.e.f. 01.01.2016 in terms of first formulation as conveyed by Board’s letter No. 2016/F(E)III/1(1)/7 dated 22.05.2017.
(ii) Pay fixed in terms of Board’s letter No. PC-VII/2017/1/7/5/8 dated 08.08.2019 w.e f. 01.07.2017 may also be treated as emoluments in terms of Rule 49 of the Railway Services (Pension) Rules, 1993 for the purpose of fixation of pension.
iii) Since, Charge Allowance may have been paid w.e.f. 01.01.2016 to 30.06.2017 at old rates which was admissible before 2016, the same may be reckoned for calculation of retirement benefits of employees who retired between the periods from 01.01.2016 to 30.06.2017.
4. Please acknowledge receipt.
(G. Priya Sudarsani)
Director, Finance (Estt.),
Railway Board.

Clarification regarding proposal in the Finance Bill 2020

$
0
0
Clarification regarding Proposal in the Finance Bill 2020

02 FEB 2020
The Finance Bill, 2020 has proposed that an Indian citizen shall be deemed to be resident in India, if he is not liable to be taxed in any country or jurisdiction. This is an anti-abuse provision since it is noticed that some Indian citizens shift their stay in low or no tax jurisdiction to avoid payment of tax in India.

            The new provision is not intended to include in tax net those Indian citizens who are bonafide workers in other countries. In some section of the media the new provision is being interpreted to create an impression that those Indians who are bonafide workers in other countries, including in Middle East, and who are not liable to tax in these countries will be taxed in India on the income that they have earned there. This interpretation is not correct.

  In order to avoid any misinterpretation, it is clarified that in case of an Indian citizen who becomes deemed resident of India under this proposed provision, income earned outside India by him shall not be taxed in India unless it is derived from an Indian business or profession. Necessary clarification, if required, shall be incorporated in the relevant provision of the law.

****V

In the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi...Gopal Singh Petitioner dated . 23.01.2020 another favourable judgement in case on notional increment

Another favourable Judgement regarding notional increment subsequent to P. Ayyamperumal judgement of Madras High Court Delhi,Madhya Pradesh & Madras High courts have Given favourable judgements. Delhi High The Court rejected the contention of the Respondents (UOI) that the judgment in P. Ayyamperuam had to be treated as one that was in personam and not in rem.DOPT & DOPPW are left with no alternative except to accept BPS demand to implement this judgement to all similarly placed.

BPS writes to Secretaries DOPT,DOPPW & DOP regarding Grant of Notional increment to those retired on 30th June with reference to Hon’ble Madras High court order dated 15.09.2017 in the case of P.Ayyamperumal.(Case No W.P.No.15732 of 2017 )


Income Tax: Basic exemption limit on the income under the Finance Act, 2019

$
0
0
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
LOK SABHA
UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 127
TO BE ANSWERED ON
MONDAY 3rd JANUARY, 2020
MAGHA 14, 1941 (SAKA)

INCOME TAX EXEMPTION

127. JASBIR SINGH GILL:
Will the Minister of FINANCE be pleased to state:
(a) whether it is a fact that the Government has decided any limit for exemption of Income Tax;
(b) if so, the details thereof;
(c) the details of limit of exemption of Income Tax before the general election of 2019; and
(d) the time by which exemption limit of Rs.5 lacs would be implemented?

ANSWER

THE MINISTER OF STATE IN MINISTRY OF FINANCE (SHRI ANURAG SINGH THAKUR)
(a) and (b): The Finance Act of respective years, inter-alia, provides for the rates of income-tax as well as the basic exemption limit on the income of individuals, Hindu undivided family, association of persons or body of individuals, artificial juridical person as defined under the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act). The Finance Bill prior to its enactment as an Act, is tabled before the Parliament during the Union Budget which is being presented every year in Lok Sabha on 1st February since 2017.
(c) Before the general election of 2019, the exemption limits were provided under the Finance Act, 2019 and were the same as the basic exemption limits as provided under the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2019 which is as below:
Nature of Person
Basic Exemption Income Level
Individual (other than senior and very senior citizen), HUF, association of persons, body of individuals and artificial juridical person.
Rs 2,50,000/-
Individual, resident in India who is of the age of sixty years or more but less than eighty years. (senior citizen)
Rs 3,00,000
Individual, resident in India who is of the age of eighty years or more. (very senior citizen)
Rs 5,00,000
(d) Vide Finance Act, 2019, section 87A of the Act was amended to provide a 100% tax rebate to individuals having total income up to Rs. 5 lakhs.
basic-exemption-limit-on-the-income-hindi

Whether the Government is planning to provide “age relaxation” under 10 per cent “economically weaker sections (EWS)” quota? Reply by Govt. in Lok Sabha

$
0
0

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT
LOK SABHA
UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 305
TO BE ANSWERED ON 04.02.2020

Age Relaxation under EWS Quota

305. SHRI SAPTAGIRI SANKAR ULAKA:
Will the Minister of SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT be pleased to state:
(a) whether the Government is planning to provide “age relaxation” under 10 per cent “economically weaker sections” quota;
(b) if so, the details thereof and if not, the reasons therefor;
(c) the timeline by which the relaxation would be implemented;
(d) the reasons for delay in providing age relaxation; and
(e) the number of people who have secured jobs under EWS category, State-wise?

ANSWER

MINISTER OF STATE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE AND EMPOWERMENT (SHRI KRISHAN PAL GURJAR)
(a) to (d): At present, no policy decision has been taken by the Government.
(e): No such data is maintained by the Government regarding the State-wise number of people who have secured jobs under the Economically Weaker Sections (EWS) category.
****
question-to-provide-age-relaxation-under-ews-quota

Grant of Notional increment to those retired on 30th June- Hon’ble Madras High court order dtd 15.9.017 in the case of P. Ayyamperumal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 04.11.2013 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.MANIKUMAR Writ Petition No.28488 of 2013 M.P.No.1 of 2013 M. Murugan … Petitioner Vs. 1. The Co-operative Sub Registrar/Field Officer cum Surcharge Enquiry Officer, Madhanur, Gudiyatham Taluk, Vellore District. Court under Para 14 has explained rem & persona judgements- C.L.Pasupathy v. Engineer in Chief (WRO) reported in 2009 (2) MLJ 491 refered to in Para 14 has attained legal finality.

Extension of judicial decisions in matter of a general nature to all similarly placed

$
0
0

5th CPC  recommendation regarding  Extending judicial decisions in matter of a general nature to all similarly placed
Para 126.5 . Extending judicial decisions in matter of a general nature to all similarly placed employees:
We have observed that frequently, in cases of service litigation involving many similarly placed employees, the benefit of judgement is only extended to those employees who had agitated the matter before the Tribunal/Court. This generates lot of needless litigation. It also runs contrary to the judgement given by the full bench of Central Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore in the case of C.S. Elias Ahmed and others Vs UOI and others(OA 451 and 541 of 1991) wherein it was held  that the entire class of employee who are similarly situated are required to be given the benefit of the decision whether or not they were parties  to the original writ. Incidentally, this principle has been upheld  by the supreme court in this case as well as in numerous other judgement like GC Ghosh vs UOI (1992) 19 ATC 94 (SC)dated 20.7.1988,K. I. Shepherd vs UOI (JT 1987(3) SC 600, Abid  Hussain vs UOI (JT 1987 (1) SC 147)etc. Accordingly, we recommend that decisions taken in one specific case either by the judiciary or the Govt. should be applied to all other identical cases without forcing the other employees to approach the court of law for identical remedy or relief. We clarify that this decision will apply only in cases where a principle or common issue of general nature applicable to a group or category of government employees is concerned and not to matters relating to a specific grievance or anomaly of individual employees.
Government of India has agreed to implement judgements in rem to all similarly placed. ‘rem’ also stands explained by Hon’ble High court of Madras In C.L.Pasupathy v. Engineer in Chief (WRO) reported in 2009 (2) MLJ 491 which has achieved legal finality.

Besides, CAT Ernakulum. High courts of Madras, Madhya Pradesh (Jabalpur & Indore)and Delhi have given favourable judgements considering  judgment in P. Ayyamperuam of Madras high court to be the law .
The Honourable Delhi  Court in W.P.(C) 5539/2019 ARUN CHHIBBER  versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.  O R D E R dated  13.01.2020 has rejected the contention of the respondents(UOI & othrs) that the judgment in P. Ayyamperuam had to be treated as one that was in personam and not in rem-BPS is now close to success on the issue of Notional increment to those who retire/retired  on completion of 365 days service on 30thJune/31st of December and also implementation of judgements in ‘rem’ to all similarly situated.
Now Pensioners National Forums and Associations need buildup pressure. 

S C Maheshwari
Secy.Genl;  Bharat Pensioners Samaj

Regarding generation of PPO Number in respect of the pension cases not processing through Pension Module of PFMS

Minutes of the meeting with heads of CPPCs of all authorised banks other than SBI.


Minutes of the meeting with heads of CPPCs/GBDs of State Bank of India.

Shifting from BSR Code to IFSC for identifying the Branch of the Authorised Banks.

CGHS Wellness Center at Chandrapur (Mah

Generating of PPO Number in respect of the pension cases not processing through Pension Module of PFMS

$
0
0

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF FINANCE
DEPARTMENT OF EXPENDITURE
CENTRAL PENSION ACCOUNTING OFFICE
TRIKOOT-II, BHIKAJI CAMA PLACE
NEW DELHI-110066
CPAO/IT&Tech/PFMS/84 (P.F)/ 2019-20/178
Dated 07.02.2020
CIRCULAR
Subject: Regarding generation of PPO Number in respect of the pension cases not processing through Pension Module of PFMS.
The Central Pension Accounting Office has stopped allotment of PPO Number through their website for fresh pension cases where Pension Module has been activated on PFMS Portal.
2. It was informed by the ITD, O/o the Controller General of Accounts that following cases are not being processed through HMS :-
a. Disability/Family Pension under EOP Rules
b. Family Pension to more than one person like twins, more than one widow [Rule 57)
c. Issue of alternate PPO-Capturing of information regarding cancellation of PPO and issue of new PPO to another family member
d. Provision to handle the cases where pensioner expired immediately after retirement and before filing Pension Papers
e. Pension case pertaining to those employees who are getting provisional pension and gets regular pension on a later date
f. Pension cases of those employees which are being handled after completion of more than one year and Provision for payment of arrear of pension
g. Dual Family pension case
3. All the Pr. CCAs/CCAs/CAs of all the Ministries are requested to direct the Pay and Accounts Offices where Pension Module has been activated on PFMS Portal to send the details of the pensioners along with the scanned copy of PAN mentioned in the Proforma attached herewith for generation of PPO Number in respect of the pension cases mentioned at Sl. No. 2 above to CPAO.
This issues with the approval of the Chief Controller (Pensions).
(Praful Dabral)
Sr. Accounts Officer (IT & Tech

CENTRAL Administrative Tribunal Hyderabad Bench dt " 28.01.20.20

Viewing all 4990 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>